Brauchen wir individualisierte Krankenversicherungstarife in Form von Smartwatches?
Protokoll einer Debatte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14464/zsem.v40i1-2.694Keywords:
privacy concerns, individualized health insurance rates, public debate, democracy, decision-making, political discourse, personal freedom, smartwatches, nudgingAbstract
As part of the conference “Surveillance 2.0 – ZwischenKontrolle und Komfort” at the Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, six Masters students of Media Science participated in a public debate. They discussed the issues of individualised health insurance rates which are linked to behaviour data measured by smartwatches. Pros and cons were presented in three turns on each side. The arguments dealt with this specific form of surveillance and its potential effects on collective benefits and individual freedom. The government emphasises the encouragement of healthy living, social fairness and prevention of diseases, while the opposition counters particularly with privacy concerns, relentless health pressure as well as ethical and moral risks of that kind of surveillance. The debate’s protocol and a preface about debating culture will be provided below.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sven Jentzsch, Franziska Sieb, Frederica Tsirakidou, Martin Möller, Alexander Danner, Berit Stier, Julius Trautmann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors. The content is published under a Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). This permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is otherwise in compliance with the licence.